Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoning Policy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 395 hits. Analysis detected 3,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,483 of 16,562 topics). This Zoning Policy is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Zoning Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos