Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoning Disputes results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,703 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,694 of 16,562 topics). This Zoning Disputes is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Zoning Disputes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,703
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos