Topic summary
⁠24%2 analyzed articles/videos1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zionism results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,027 hits. Analysis detected 8,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (11,849 of 15,435 topics). This Zionism is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Zionism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,172
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.0%0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos