Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zimbabwe Politics results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,653 of 16,562 topics). This Zimbabwe Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Zimbabwe Politics
Topic details
Total words: 852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.0% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles852 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.6%17.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.8%10.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos