Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video1,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zero Day Exploits results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 4,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,409 of 16,562 topics). This Zero Day Exploits is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Zero Day Exploits
Topic details
Total words: 5,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos