Topic summary
⁠11%2 analyzed articles/videos1,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zero Day Exploitation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 417 hits. Analysis detected 2,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,658 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,257 of 16,562 topics). This Zero Day Exploitation is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Zero Day Exploitation
Topic details
Total words: 4,658
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos