Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Zendaya And Tom Holland results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 1,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Zendaya And Tom Holland is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Zendaya And Tom Holland
Topic details
Total words: 1,588
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos