Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youth Engagement results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 275 hits . Analysis detected 1,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (12,016 of 16,562 topics). This Youth Engagement is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Youth Engagement
Topic details
Total words: 3,156
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst