Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yazidi Genocide results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 651 hits. Analysis detected 3,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,714 of 16,562 topics). This Yazidi Genocide is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Yazidi Genocide
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos