Topic summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video1,244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wwii Veteran results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 1,290 hits. Analysis detected 3,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (10,323 of 22,715 topics). This Wwii Veteran is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Wwii Veteran
Topic details
Total words: 4,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 25.9%25.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 25.9%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos