Topic summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wrongful Termination results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,910 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (16,802 of 22,543 topics). This Wrongful Termination is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Wrongful Termination
Topic details
Total words: 3,910
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos