Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video23 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Series Preview results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 345 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (19 of 16,562 topics). This World Series Preview is worse (more manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
World Series Preview
Topic details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 60.9%60.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 46.4%46.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 40.6%40.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 39.1%39.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 46.4%46.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 33.3%33.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.3%20.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Topic 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Framing Effect: Topic 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 60.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 46.4%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 46.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 40.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 39.1%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos