Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Series Championship results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 180 hits . Analysis detected 1,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of 100% (34 of 16,562 topics). This World Series Championship is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. World Series Championship
Topic details
Total words: 180
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
100% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.8% percentile 40.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles180 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 87.8% 87.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 100.0% 100.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 83.3% 83.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 74.4% 74.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 58.3% 58.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 75.0% 75.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 41.7% 41.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 37.8% 37.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 29.4% 29.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 28.9% 28.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% 120% 120% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 100.0%, sitewide 15.9% Bandwagon: Topic 87.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Topic 83.3%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Topic 75.0%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 74.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 58.3%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Topic 41.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 7.5% No True Scotsman: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst