Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Series Championship results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 1,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of 100% (34 of 16,562 topics). This World Series Championship is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
World Series Championship
Topic details
Total words: 180
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.8% percentile
40.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles180 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 87.8%87.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 83.3%83.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 74.4%74.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 58.3%58.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 75.0%75.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 41.7%41.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 37.8%37.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 29.4%29.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 28.9%28.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Topic 87.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 83.3%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 75.0%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 74.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 58.3%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 41.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 7.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos