Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These World Heritage Listing results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 386 hits. Analysis detected 1,475 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,275 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This World Heritage Listing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
World Heritage Listing
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%World Heritage Listing (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,275
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 30.3%30.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 30.3%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos