Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Viewership results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,682 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,474 of 16,562 topics). This World Cup Viewership is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
World Cup Viewership
Topic details
Total words: 2,682
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos