Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Security results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 1,290 hits. Analysis detected 7,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,467 of 16,562 topics). This World Cup Security is worse (more manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group.
World Cup Security
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.1% percentile
9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 46.0%46.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.6%35.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.6%27.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.0%19.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 46.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos