Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Cup Kc results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,069 hits. Analysis detected 5,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,562 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,066 of 16,562 topics). This World Cup Kc is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
World Cup Kc
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,562
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.2%19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos