Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Championship results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 877 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,013 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,324 of 16,562 topics). This World Championship is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
World Championship
Topic details
Total words: 2,013
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos