Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Bank Managed Fund results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 1,330 hits. Analysis detected 6,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,922 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,391 of 16,562 topics). This World Bank Managed Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
World Bank Managed Fund
Topic details
Total words: 2,922
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.6% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.5%45.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.3%18.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.5%12.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos