Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Workshops results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 417 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,466 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,460 topics). This Workshops is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Workshops
Topic details
Total words: 2,466
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos