Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace Harassment Policy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 59.4% saturation with 745 hits. Analysis detected 3,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,254 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,136 of 16,562 topics). This Workplace Harassment Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Workplace Harassment Policy
Topic details
Total words: 1,254
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.1% percentile
10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 59.4%59.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 45.5%45.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 22.6%22.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 26.9%26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.1%26.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 59.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos