Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Workplace Fatalities results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 281 hits. Analysis detected 1,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Workplace Fatalities is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Workplace Fatalities
Topic details
Total words: 3,232
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos