Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Working Conditions results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Working Conditions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Working Conditions
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Working Conditions (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos