Topic summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video3,807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Working Class Politics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 2,180 hits. Analysis detected 15,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,139 of 16,562 topics). This Working Class Politics is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Working Class Politics
Topic details
Total words: 15,228
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos