Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workforce Culture results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 2,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,641 of 16,562 topics). This Workforce Culture is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Workforce Culture
Topic details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos