Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video2,359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worker Surveillance results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 725 hits. Analysis detected 4,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,077 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (12,976 of 15,565 topics). This Worker Surveillance is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Worker Surveillance
Topic details
Total words: 7,077
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos