Topic summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 680 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worker Cooperatives results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 343 hits . Analysis detected 2,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (3,526 of 15,612 topics). This Worker Cooperatives is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Worker Cooperatives
Topic details
Total words: 2,040
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.4% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.8% 16.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Middle Ground: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst