Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Work And Careers results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 837 hits. Analysis detected 4,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,914 of 15,847 topics). This Work And Careers is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Work And Careers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos