Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wolverines results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 718 hits. Analysis detected 4,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,087 of 16,562 topics). This Wolverines is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Wolverines
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.4%21.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.3%13.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos