Topic summary
51%1 analyzed article/video629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Supreme Court Election results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 730 hits. Analysis detected 2,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,955 of 16,562 topics). This Wisconsin Supreme Court Election is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Election
Topic details
Total words: 2,516
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos