Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wireless Charging Technology results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 2,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,409 of 16,562 topics). This Wireless Charging Technology is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Wireless Charging Technology
Topic details
Total words: 3,152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Qi fan fan34%
The Verge56%By Thomas Ricker0%7/4/2026, 12:00:00 AM