Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winter Hiking results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 606 hits. Analysis detected 4,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,221 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,116 of 16,562 topics). This Winter Hiking is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Winter Hiking
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,221
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.4%13.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos