Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Loss Aversion, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 3,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,997 of 16,562 topics). This Windows is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Windows
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos