Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Cain results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 2,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,803 of 16,562 topics). This Will Cain is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Will Cain
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos