Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Rescue results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Unattributed Quote, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 1,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,688 of 16,562 topics). This Wildlife Rescue is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Wildlife Rescue
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos