Topic summary
⁠36%2 analyzed articles/videos2,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Reintroduction results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 829 hits. Analysis detected 4,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,539 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (13,749 of 15,361 topics). This Wildlife Reintroduction is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Wildlife Reintroduction
Topic details
Total words: 7,539
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos