Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Refuges results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Primacy Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 1,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,934 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,279 of 16,562 topics). This Wildlife Refuges is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Wildlife Refuges
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,934
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.6%15.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos