Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Naming results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 946 hits. Analysis detected 2,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,670 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,576 of 16,562 topics). This Wildlife Naming is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Wildlife Naming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,670
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 35.4%35.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 35.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos