Topic summary
⁠19%2 analyzed articles/videos1,761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Encounters results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 3,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,609 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,342 of 16,245 topics). This Wildlife Encounters is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Wildlife Encounters
Topic details
Total words: 5,609
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos