Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Preparedness results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,544 hits. Analysis detected 5,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,342 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,419 of 16,313 topics). This Wildfire Preparedness is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
Wildfire Preparedness
Topic details
Total words: 8,342
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 18.5%18.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos