Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Coordination results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (9,842 of 15,611 topics). This Wildfire Coordination is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Wildfire Coordination
Topic details
Total words: 2,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos