Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Containment results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 799 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,509 of 15,447 topics). This Wildfire Containment is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Wildfire Containment
Topic details
Total words: 1,092
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Middle Ground: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos