Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Strategy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 536 hits. Analysis detected 3,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 53% (7,404 of 15,585 topics). This White House Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
White House Strategy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 53%White House Strategy (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos