Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These White House Restoration results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 883 hits. Analysis detected 2,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This White House Restoration is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
White House Restoration
Topic details
Total words: 2,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 35.0%35.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos