Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Relations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,005 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,232 of 16,562 topics). This White House Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
White House Relations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠87%White House Relations (selected)8%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,005
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 21.5%21.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.8%25.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.8%11.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos