Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Events results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 1,639 hits. Analysis detected 9,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,800 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,824 of 15,329 topics). This White House Events is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
White House Events
Topic details
Total words: 6,800
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.1%24.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos