Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whatsapp Gold results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 750 hits. Analysis detected 3,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,360 of 16,562 topics). This Whatsapp Gold is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Whatsapp Gold
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos