Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wetlands Regulation results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 476 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,265 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (15,427 of 23,480 topics). This Wetlands Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Wetlands Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 2,265
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos