Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Welfare Fraud results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 3,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,455 of 16,327 topics). This Welfare Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Welfare Fraud
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,516
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.6%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos