Topic summary
41%1 analyzed article/video984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Webdav results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,421 of 16,562 topics). This Webdav is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Webdav
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos