Topic summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Webdav results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,421 of 16,562 topics). This Webdav is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Webdav
Topic details
Total words: 2,952
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst